<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon Error Search Domino Effect: Turning the &#8220;Free Internet&#8221; Into Compuserve / Prodigy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/verizon-error-search-domino-effect-turning-the-free-internet-into-compuserve-prodigy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/verizon-error-search-domino-effect-turning-the-free-internet-into-compuserve-prodigy/</link>
	<description>Frank Schilling&#039;s Official Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 23:21:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seven Mile &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Gradual Marginalization of Browser Traffic</title>
		<link>http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/verizon-error-search-domino-effect-turning-the-free-internet-into-compuserve-prodigy/comment-page-1/#comment-4868</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven Mile &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Gradual Marginalization of Browser Traffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenmile.com/2007-11/verizon-error-search-domino-effect-turning-the-free-internet-into-compuserve-prodigy/#comment-4868</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211; Sitefinder style error hijack by your ISP such as Charter, Earthlink or Verizon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Sitefinder style error hijack by your ISP such as Charter, Earthlink or Verizon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Corwin</title>
		<link>http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/verizon-error-search-domino-effect-turning-the-free-internet-into-compuserve-prodigy/comment-page-1/#comment-4732</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Corwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 04:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenmile.com/2007-11/verizon-error-search-domino-effect-turning-the-free-internet-into-compuserve-prodigy/#comment-4732</guid>
		<description>I spoke on a panel today at the International Trademark Association Leadership meeting in Orlando, along with Sarah Deutsch of Verizon. Sarah laid into Sedo, Oversee, ICANN, the Cameroons, the ICA&#039;s new Code of Conduct (which prompted me to observe that, indeed, no good deed goes unpunished), parked pages, and domainers generally, questioned whether direct search provided any consumer benefits at all, and finished up with a call for tougher trademark laws and new international TM conventions.

After showing my powerpoints illustrating how Google Microsoft, and even ISPs run ads against trademarks and typos thereof (thanks, Frank, for teaching this to me), I honed in on Verizon&#039;s new advanced web search, repeating Dr. Berryhiil&#039;s findings as to how Verizon/Yahoo serve up, in response to I-Want-Sprint-Cellphones.com, a host of ad links none of which lead to Sprint. Sarah promptly admonished me for &quot;attacking&quot; Verizon (to which I retorted it was hardly an attack, just a  factual description of what they serve up, and then went on to say that they were late to a game that most other ISPs engaged in (which I felt kinda reiterated my point), how they let consumers opt out, how they serve up some natural search results and provide a link to Sprint (which is not what John reported), and how this is really just a useful customer service and not that nasty infringement that domainers engage in. 

Then they beat me with a rubber hose (just kidding...;-)

Actually, I got some positive feedback after. But Verizon at least is dead serious about creating a trademark regime that is a domain hijacker&#039;s wet dream.

Your ICA at work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoke on a panel today at the International Trademark Association Leadership meeting in Orlando, along with Sarah Deutsch of Verizon. Sarah laid into Sedo, Oversee, ICANN, the Cameroons, the ICA&#8217;s new Code of Conduct (which prompted me to observe that, indeed, no good deed goes unpunished), parked pages, and domainers generally, questioned whether direct search provided any consumer benefits at all, and finished up with a call for tougher trademark laws and new international TM conventions.</p>
<p>After showing my powerpoints illustrating how Google Microsoft, and even ISPs run ads against trademarks and typos thereof (thanks, Frank, for teaching this to me), I honed in on Verizon&#8217;s new advanced web search, repeating Dr. Berryhiil&#8217;s findings as to how Verizon/Yahoo serve up, in response to I-Want-Sprint-Cellphones.com, a host of ad links none of which lead to Sprint. Sarah promptly admonished me for &#8220;attacking&#8221; Verizon (to which I retorted it was hardly an attack, just a  factual description of what they serve up, and then went on to say that they were late to a game that most other ISPs engaged in (which I felt kinda reiterated my point), how they let consumers opt out, how they serve up some natural search results and provide a link to Sprint (which is not what John reported), and how this is really just a useful customer service and not that nasty infringement that domainers engage in. </p>
<p>Then they beat me with a rubber hose (just kidding&#8230;;-)</p>
<p>Actually, I got some positive feedback after. But Verizon at least is dead serious about creating a trademark regime that is a domain hijacker&#8217;s wet dream.</p>
<p>Your ICA at work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrester</title>
		<link>http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/verizon-error-search-domino-effect-turning-the-free-internet-into-compuserve-prodigy/comment-page-1/#comment-4706</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenmile.com/2007-11/verizon-error-search-domino-effect-turning-the-free-internet-into-compuserve-prodigy/#comment-4706</guid>
		<description>Intent is what is protectable or actionable in a court of law isn&#039;t it John?

And, A persons right to a successful Intentional Navigation, is as basic a Right, as any of the Rights we are Given in the U.S. Constitutions Bill of Rights, in my thinking.

Yes, this is new untried unwritten Law, but none the less, it is a self evident Right that everyone should expect to enjoy.

So listen up Verisign, Verizon, MS, Mozilla, ISP&#039;s and any other SOB&#039;s thats wants to determine where I go, other than where I Intended to be.

Don&#039;t mess with MY INTENT (or remove/hinder my ability to navigate to where I want and intend/ed to go) or I&#039;ll/We&#039;ll sue you, in a Court of Law.

And make the Right to Intentional Navigation a Law.

I would think, that there is plenty of sited Case&#039;s, Legal Decisions, and existing Law&#039;s, that already cover prohibition of Restraint of Trade by a common carrier of goods and or services, that would be applicable, and provide grounds for a successful Legal Action, that would stop the practice, now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intent is what is protectable or actionable in a court of law isn&#8217;t it John?</p>
<p>And, A persons right to a successful Intentional Navigation, is as basic a Right, as any of the Rights we are Given in the U.S. Constitutions Bill of Rights, in my thinking.</p>
<p>Yes, this is new untried unwritten Law, but none the less, it is a self evident Right that everyone should expect to enjoy.</p>
<p>So listen up Verisign, Verizon, MS, Mozilla, ISP&#8217;s and any other SOB&#8217;s thats wants to determine where I go, other than where I Intended to be.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t mess with MY INTENT (or remove/hinder my ability to navigate to where I want and intend/ed to go) or I&#8217;ll/We&#8217;ll sue you, in a Court of Law.</p>
<p>And make the Right to Intentional Navigation a Law.</p>
<p>I would think, that there is plenty of sited Case&#8217;s, Legal Decisions, and existing Law&#8217;s, that already cover prohibition of Restraint of Trade by a common carrier of goods and or services, that would be applicable, and provide grounds for a successful Legal Action, that would stop the practice, now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

