Peter @ Domainer’s Gazette writes:
“”hey Frank,not sure if this is old news to you, but TechCrunch is covering the re-launch of Phone.com and Software.com
http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/15/the-return-of-phonecom-and-softwarecom/
-peter”"
***FS*** Old news to me but perhaps some others here haven’t seen it.. reposted.. Thats the nice thing about domain names.. If your business plan flops and things don’t work-out, you get a re-do!!
This entry was posted by frankschilling on Thursday, November 15th, 2007 at 9:29 PM and is filed under
Domain Names (Domains). You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
The way I like to explain it is that a domain is like a convertible security, if the upside doesnt pan out for some reason (which we hope to never discover), and you got a good deal on the underlying security (domain), you have downside protection similar to how a the convertible security reverts to a bond on the downside if it fails on the upside and is called.
Also I like to think I am a little more than a board member of Phone.com, I am the majority owner, and founder, and writer of the model too.
Citi’s feeble attempt at redeeming themselves from their yesteryear of credit-shenanigans comes through a descriptive 3-worder http://www.UseCreditWisely.com
that leads back to their credit pages. The whole story is here http://finextra.com/fullpr.asp?id=18529