<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Domain Names to be Irrelevant&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/domain-names-to-be-irrelevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/domain-names-to-be-irrelevant/</link>
	<description>Frank Schilling&#039;s Official Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chang</title>
		<link>http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/domain-names-to-be-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-4692</link>
		<dc:creator>Chang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 06:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenmile.com/2007-11/domain-names-to-be-irrelevant/#comment-4692</guid>
		<description>And the guy reckons you won&#039;t be able to make money selling domains unless if you have things like Pepsi.com. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the guy reckons you won&#8217;t be able to make money selling domains unless if you have things like Pepsi.com. <img src='http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregoryZ</title>
		<link>http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/domain-names-to-be-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-4691</link>
		<dc:creator>GregoryZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 05:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenmile.com/2007-11/domain-names-to-be-irrelevant/#comment-4691</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not nearly as enthusiastic about major companies someday seeing the light on generic domain names. Would shoes.com be a helpful domain for Nike? Probably yes. Would they get that domain? Probably not. Just like you likely won&#039;t see Nike reps handing out ad flyers on street corners. While that marketing tactic might be helpful, they don&#039;t really need to do that. Their brand is big enough and their marketing budget is such that they&#039;ll continue to generate sales the usual way by promoting &quot;the brand.&quot; I am in a very large corporate strategic planning function and we have a department of people whose livelihood is the care and protection of our corporate brand. They have a vested interest in seeing to it that we don&#039;t dilute the vaunted corporate brand. All of the Fortune 500 are in a similar boat. And the next 500 have high paid consultants telling them that too. I even think that the Dallas Cowboys football organization doesn&#039;t really &#039;need&#039; cowboys.com. 

But, here&#039;s the direction I see. Advertising CAMPAIGNS are heading down the domain name road. I am seeing a growing use of generic domain phrases for specific ad campaigns. So, while Nike might not be interested in shoes.com, they would quickly grab &quot;justdoit.com&quot; rather than &quot;nike.com/justdoit&quot; or whatever ad phrase is going on to promote something special. If I were an ad agency, I would be grabbing bunches of useful generic ad phrase domains to keep in inventory for whatever pitch they want to make.

Having said that, I think the real and main potential for generic domain names will always be for new businesses. And, in that regard, I would far and away want shoes.com rather than having to spend millions to create awareness that nuwatuzziara.com sells great shoes online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not nearly as enthusiastic about major companies someday seeing the light on generic domain names. Would shoes.com be a helpful domain for Nike? Probably yes. Would they get that domain? Probably not. Just like you likely won&#8217;t see Nike reps handing out ad flyers on street corners. While that marketing tactic might be helpful, they don&#8217;t really need to do that. Their brand is big enough and their marketing budget is such that they&#8217;ll continue to generate sales the usual way by promoting &#8220;the brand.&#8221; I am in a very large corporate strategic planning function and we have a department of people whose livelihood is the care and protection of our corporate brand. They have a vested interest in seeing to it that we don&#8217;t dilute the vaunted corporate brand. All of the Fortune 500 are in a similar boat. And the next 500 have high paid consultants telling them that too. I even think that the Dallas Cowboys football organization doesn&#8217;t really &#8216;need&#8217; cowboys.com. </p>
<p>But, here&#8217;s the direction I see. Advertising CAMPAIGNS are heading down the domain name road. I am seeing a growing use of generic domain phrases for specific ad campaigns. So, while Nike might not be interested in shoes.com, they would quickly grab &#8220;justdoit.com&#8221; rather than &#8220;nike.com/justdoit&#8221; or whatever ad phrase is going on to promote something special. If I were an ad agency, I would be grabbing bunches of useful generic ad phrase domains to keep in inventory for whatever pitch they want to make.</p>
<p>Having said that, I think the real and main potential for generic domain names will always be for new businesses. And, in that regard, I would far and away want shoes.com rather than having to spend millions to create awareness that nuwatuzziara.com sells great shoes online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/domain-names-to-be-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-4676</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenmile.com/2007-11/domain-names-to-be-irrelevant/#comment-4676</guid>
		<description>Like selling ice to Eskimos...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like selling ice to Eskimos&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

