<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Social Networking Site..  Without a Name.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/a-social-networking-site-without-a-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/a-social-networking-site-without-a-name/</link>
	<description>Frank Schilling&#039;s Official Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danno</title>
		<link>http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/a-social-networking-site-without-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-4651</link>
		<dc:creator>Danno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 01:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenmile.com/2007-11/a-social-networking-site-without-a-name/#comment-4651</guid>
		<description>Hi,

&quot;launch.yahoo.com, music.yahoo.com, musicvideos.yahoo.com, videos.yahoo.com&quot;
__
I agree that all these should just resolve to launch.com...and only launch.com should be promoted.

Also,

If Yahoo and other companies keep insisting on using &#039;sub domains&#039; in their advertising campaigns...

Would not all these company&#039;s be much better off using &#039;full domains&#039; like musicyahoo.com,yahoomusic.com, yahoovideo.com, videosyahoo.com for advertising and promotionals and redirecting them back to their corresponding &#039;sub domains&#039;...instead of actually relying on just the &#039;sub domains&#039;?

I find it completely bizarre &amp; backwards that say Verizon will use: verizon.com/highspeed or verizon.com/broadband in a multi million dollar ad campaigns. 

Instead of of using
verizonhighspeed.com or verizonbroadband.com and just redirecting these to their corresponding &#039;sub domains&#039;.

IMHO...I really do not think a company like Verizon should even &#039;redirect&#039; or use any &#039;sub domains&#039;. They should just build stand alone mini sites for specific products and services.

Peace!
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>&#8220;launch.yahoo.com, music.yahoo.com, musicvideos.yahoo.com, videos.yahoo.com&#8221;<br />
__<br />
I agree that all these should just resolve to launch.com&#8230;and only launch.com should be promoted.</p>
<p>Also,</p>
<p>If Yahoo and other companies keep insisting on using &#8216;sub domains&#8217; in their advertising campaigns&#8230;</p>
<p>Would not all these company&#8217;s be much better off using &#8216;full domains&#8217; like musicyahoo.com,yahoomusic.com, yahoovideo.com, videosyahoo.com for advertising and promotionals and redirecting them back to their corresponding &#8216;sub domains&#8217;&#8230;instead of actually relying on just the &#8216;sub domains&#8217;?</p>
<p>I find it completely bizarre &amp; backwards that say Verizon will use: verizon.com/highspeed or verizon.com/broadband in a multi million dollar ad campaigns. </p>
<p>Instead of of using<br />
verizonhighspeed.com or verizonbroadband.com and just redirecting these to their corresponding &#8216;sub domains&#8217;.</p>
<p>IMHO&#8230;I really do not think a company like Verizon should even &#8216;redirect&#8217; or use any &#8216;sub domains&#8217;. They should just build stand alone mini sites for specific products and services.</p>
<p>Peace!<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wrixon</title>
		<link>http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/a-social-networking-site-without-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-4647</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wrixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenmile.com/2007-11/a-social-networking-site-without-a-name/#comment-4647</guid>
		<description>Yes, but that presupposes that doing what Wall Street wants is actually the right decision for the longer-term prosperity of the company. I would hazard a guess that in the majority of instances, it just isn&#039;t. Sometimes you get the impression the goal is not so much growth as volatility. Lets face it, arbritraging good solid steady growth is a really tough call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but that presupposes that doing what Wall Street wants is actually the right decision for the longer-term prosperity of the company. I would hazard a guess that in the majority of instances, it just isn&#8217;t. Sometimes you get the impression the goal is not so much growth as volatility. Lets face it, arbritraging good solid steady growth is a really tough call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: equity78</title>
		<link>http://domainnamesales.com/sevenmile/2007-11/a-social-networking-site-without-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-4640</link>
		<dc:creator>equity78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sevenmile.com/2007-11/a-social-networking-site-without-a-name/#comment-4640</guid>
		<description>Frank I agree yahoo is so mismanaged its not funny.  I mean they can do nothing right.  I stopped using launch when they switched just like you did. I would think they a buy but the market believes GOOGLE the smart play crossed $730 and yhoo goes down on a day when an IPO in Hong Kong opens big and they own a big piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank I agree yahoo is so mismanaged its not funny.  I mean they can do nothing right.  I stopped using launch when they switched just like you did. I would think they a buy but the market believes GOOGLE the smart play crossed $730 and yhoo goes down on a day when an IPO in Hong Kong opens big and they own a big piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

